And so here we are on the cusp of Armageddon because of irresponsible journalism. This whole presenting the argument for both sides has been taken too far since Trump entered politics.
Of course journalists should strive to be balanced and fair. But if, from the get go, one side of the argument is rooted in falsehoods, then it should be called out! Not registered as “an alternative opinion” and given oxygen and the light of day in news columns in some sort of twisted logic. False equivalence occurs when lies are given equal weight as facts, eroding trust in journalism and confusing the public. This practice amplifies disinformation and frustration. Responsible journalism should prioritize accuracy over artificial balance, emphasizing verified information and exposing falsehoods. While diverse perspectives are vital, truth must remain the foundation of reporting to ensure audiences are informed, not misled, by the pursuit of fairness.
As a society, we have to be able to identify and share what is true, and what is false. If our institutions, courts, and businesses utilize falsehoods to make decisions and policy, then our social structure will break down. We all know what lies are and if crimes are resolved based on lies and misinformation, then there is no justice. And a society without a valid system of justice cannot stand long and remain healthy.
I think too many journalists are looking for clicks at any cost. And the quickest way to get clicks is interview some crazy son of a bitch with really twisted ideas and present it as “the argument for the other side”. Many second rate journalists are looking for a little recognition and a little jingle in their pockets and are willing to write anything that will garner a click. And this problem is getting worse, as more and more of the major political players in the United States have criminal records and are involved in some sort of public shake down or fraud. Many sub-par journalists are “influencers”, not reporters. And many Mom & Pops can’t differentiate between the two.
Below is a Media Bias Chart that you can find at the Harvard Library. Everyone is talking about bias as if it is alright. We need to understand our own biases of course, but even with bias, truth should be identifiable. Right? The BBC, CNN, Fox News and OAN all should be able to share facts. News organization do not generate facts. They report on them. Right?
One other trend I would like to point out involves God. Yeah. The big dude hovering in the air above the world?
Conservative groups are now invoking “God’s Will” into their arguments that don’t have facts or rely on convicted criminals as leaders. So, you have people that believe falsehoods, and believe it is God’s will at the same time. And the separation between their reality and US society is increasing and will lead to discouragement, disillusionment and anger when the “God’s Will”, house of cards crashes down among the lies and misinformation of the new administration.
Of course there are serious journalists, and a lot of good reporting is being done. Check out the current list of articles at the Atlantic for example. The writers there take their job seriously. And there are many others.
What can be done?
Comments are almost always welcome. 🙂
High Desert Explorations 